Log in



Maine Alliance for Road Associations

Road Maintenance for Private Road

  • 01 Mar 2021 11:48 AM
    Message # 10152053

    Our Statutory Association provides road  Maintenance for close to 80 landowners who access the road for use of their waterfront property or for their businesses. We currently have 3 operating gravel pits which are very busy and large trucks operate on this road all summer. With these trucks we have increased dust, damage to the roads due to increased traffic and yet they are assessed the same as those who may be just seasonal. Has anyone ever created an agreement with these kinds of businesses to increase their assessment? Or come up with some other kind of idea? 

  • 02 Mar 2021 6:51 AM
    Reply # 10154725 on 10152053
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    If you have not done so, I suggest reviewing the recent post entitled "CAN A STATUTORY ROAD ASSOCIATION RESTRICT TRAFFIC FOR COMMERCIAL USE?" and 2 replies.

    Feel free to comment or ask questions after reading. Thank you for using the Forum!

    Last modified: 02 Mar 2021 8:19 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 02 Mar 2021 1:28 PM
    Reply # 10155889 on 10152053
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The statute, 23 MRSA 3101, requires that, "The determination of each owner's share of the total cost must be fair and equitable ..."

    It seems to me that it would not be fair and equitable for those who use the road with passenger cars to contribute the same amount to maintenance as those who use the road with heavy trucks.  The Courts have so far interpreted "fair and equitable" to mean that whatever your formula is, you have to apply that formula in the same way to everyone.  So if your formula is that everyone pays the same amount, the Court would approve it.  But many road associations charge different rates for different levels of use, i.e. undeveloped lots contribute less than residential lots, year-round residents contribute more than seasonal residents, etc.  As long as that formula is applied the same way to everyone in each category, that would also be considered fair and equitable. 

    Your membership could vote to change your formula to say that commercial properties pay more than residential properties.  If you had just one gravel pit, the owner might be able to argue that it was unfair for there to be a different rate that applied only to that owner.  But where you have three, if all three are charged at a higher rate, I don't see how they could say that was unfair.  Then the question becomes how to determine what's a fair share for the owners of the gravel pits, in terms of what proportion of wear and tear on the road is due to their use as opposed to residential use.

                            The Maine Alliance for Road Associations

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software